In a delayed acknowledgment of Pakistan’s political landscape and recent elections, Shekhar Gupta, editor-in-chief of The Print, commenced his discussion on the topic 48 hours post-election. The complexity of the situation was cited as the reason for the delay, a sentiment echoed by various international media outlets.
Reflecting on a tumultuous year in Pakistani politics, international coverage of the elections was marked by sharp criticism, evident even before the election date was set. From the pre-election phase to election day irregularities and post-election controversies, attempts to undermine the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) were glaringly apparent. Despite these challenges, PTI-backed candidates secured the majority of National Assembly seats, defying earlier predictions of the outcome.
Dawn.com examines global reporting and analysis of the elections, which defied expectations and were far from predictable.
The Guardian praised Pakistan’s voters for rejecting military rule, emphasizing the importance of celebrating this democratic victory amidst regional uncertainties.
Bloomberg highlighted Imran Khan’s enduring popularity among voters, attributing the success of independent candidates to public disillusionment with traditional political dynasties.
READ ALSO — PTI Supporters in Pakistan Rally for Fair Election Results
The New York Times characterized PTI’s victory as shocking, signaling a significant departure from Pakistan’s political norms dominated by military influence.
The Independent criticized the election process, citing concerns over validity and highlighting the military’s continued interference in democratic processes.
Sky News speculated on the future political landscape, identifying the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) as potential kingmakers and noting a setback for the military’s influence.
Time Magazine pondered the response of PTI supporters to the election outcome, suggesting potential unrest given economic challenges and political disenfranchisement.
France 24 labeled the elections as the “generals’ elections,” underscoring the military’s significant influence despite not being on the ballot.
India Today urged introspection from the military, emphasizing the people’s rejection of government by “selection” and warning of potential unrest.
CNBC outlined the turbulent context of the elections amidst economic crisis and political turmoil, with Nawaz Sharif declaring victory amid allegations of vote-rigging.
Financial Times highlighted disappointment among voters, particularly the youth, over the prospect of another term under the Sharif dynasty.
CBC News cited Hasan Askari Rizvi, a military analyst, who questioned whether the military would heed the electorate’s message for change, highlighting the significance of the election outcome.